For Polling Locations, Suggested Candidates, Yard Signs and More CLICK HERE

Letter to the Editor - Deborah Rice

Dear Editor,

Bowie residents concerned about the traffic and quality of life impact of 285 apartments at the Marketplace and 400 homes on the Jesuit properties along Route 450 should be equally or more alarmed about the preliminary plan for 1,800 residential units at Melford.  This plan is going to be discussed by the Bowie Advisory Planning Board on January 10 and the City Council on the 17th.

Melford is on the Northeast corner of Routes 50 and 3/301, isolated from the rest of Bowie, with a single entrance at the end of Belair Drive.  The Conceptual Site Plan’s approval of 2,500 apartments and townhouses in this cul-de-sac office park is being challenged by citizens of Bowie in the Court of Special Appeals.  Still St. John Properties is pushing forward by submitting a preliminary plan for about 1,800 of those units.

The Melford Village traffic analysis found at full build out that the residential component alone would generate 14,000 car trips per day.  City planners recommended against approval of the Marketplace apartments because traffic on Stonybrook Drive and Superior Lane would exceed level of service “C”.  The Melford preliminary plan will have the same impact on these streets, and more, as residents try to circumvent congestion on Routes 3, 450, and 197; a traffic analysis of Belair Drive already proved this to be true.  We believe for that reason alone the preliminary plan should be disapproved.

The County’s General Plan says Melford is one of three unconnected parcels forming a “Local Town Center,” along with the Bowie Town Center and Gateway Plaza.  Guidelines for these Centers call for a dense “core” and a less dense “edge”– so why is the dense residential development at the edge on the Melford parcel? 

We need to hit the “pause” button on all of these developments and consider their collective impact – not one at a time.  We also need a plan showing how Melford’s proposal for dense residential development contributes to the overall Bowie “Town Center.”  A new master plan is on the horizon for 2018 so this presents the opportunity.

Deborah & John Rice

Citizens' group seeks signatures to recall Bowie mayor, two council members

by John McNamara - Bowie Blade News 

About 50 Bowie residents are unhappy with the decisions of the city's government, and they're planing to do something about it.

A group calling itself "Bowie Citizens for Accountable Government" has been meeting for several weeks to plot strategy. The group wants to collect enough signatures to force a recall election targeting City Council members Diane Polangin (District 2), Jimmy Marcos (at-large) and Mayor G. Frederick Robinson.

Members of the group expects to begin knocking on doors later this month to collect signatures. They also plan to launch a website in the next few weeks.

"The group was not just formed for this recall initiative," said Larry Swank, one of the members of the group. "There's going to be a long-term monitoring of what's going on and we'll have a home base for people to come who have concerns. This is just one activity that this group is going to initiate."

According to the city charter, voters may file a petition with the city clerk for the recall of any council member or mayor with six months or more remaining in his or her term.

The last citywide election was in 2015. For the first time, the mayor and council members were elected to four-year terms, meaning that the next citywide election wouldn't be until 2019.

 

Bowie council approves Marketplace apartments

A special recall election will be held if 25 percent of the registered voters within the district of the affected council member or within the city for at-large council members (like Marcos) or the mayor have signed a petition within 30 days of its filing.

According to the charter, the special election will take place within 30 days of the certification of the signatures.

"I've been hearing they were going to do this," Robinson said. "I understand people being upset ... Obviously, it stems from the people who disagreed with us on the Marketplace (apartments). I'm confident we made the right decision."

County board OK's preliminary plan for Marketplace apartments

Robinson contends that the city couldn't afford to let the old Marketplace shopping center deteriorate any further because it would have hurt the rest of the Route 450 retail corridor that forms the heart of Bowie. Getting Berman Enterprises, a Rockville-based developer, to revitalize the shopping center also meant allowing apartments on the property — which the zoning of the site allows.

Residents contended that the complex is too large — even scaled down from the initial plan for 300 units to the current 225.

"I can understand they're very upset," Marcos said. "I truly believe we did what was in the best interests of the city. I've done everything I can to help our community — I was born and raised here. I don't feel I've ever done anything to hurt it."

Polangin declined to comment. "They're going to do what they're going to do," she said.

In a 4-3 vote earlier this year, the council approved a 225-unit apartment complex to accompany the new Marketplace shopping center that opened last fall. The vote angered many residents, who cited concerns over traffic, potential crime and the adverse affect an apartment complex's presence could have on the value of nearby homes.

Robinson, Marcos and Polangin all voted in favor of the apartments. So did council member Courtney Glass. The shopping center and the future apartments are in District 2, Polangin's district.

Swank, meanwhile, owns a house on Scarlett Lane and the new complex will sit just beyond his backyard fence.

"That (apartment vote) started a lot of this," Swank said. "There's a swell. A lot of people that have joined this (group) are concerned about other development. We just think they are a little off-base and not responsive to citizens' concerns and that's why this initiative has taken place."

Residents have also been vocal in their objection to the Melford development near Routes 50 & 301, which will add 1,700 more housing units (apartments and townhomes) to the city's residential inventory. Plans for a 400-home development near Sacred Heart Catholic Church on Route 450 also drew heated opposition at public hearings.

Swank says the citizens group has a core of about 50 members and plans to recruit more volunteers in the days ahead. To initiate a recall election for Polangin in District 2, the group will need to collect about 2,700 signatures on their petition – one-fourth of the registered voters in the district.

A petition opposing the Marketplace apartments that residents turned into the city included 900 signatures – about one-third of the total needed to set the wheels in motion for a recall election.

Reaching that benchmark for Robinson and Marcos will be more difficult, Swank acknowledged. Since they both hold citywide offices, the citizens group would need to collect about 11,000 signatures, or one-third of the city's 43,000 registered voters.

He said that the group will find out early on if there's enough support to bring about a recall election involving Robinson and Marcos.

"Getting 12,000 (signatures) is a lot bigger number than the few thousand we need for the district," he said. "We'll see how it goes. We're going to go with what we've got and learn from what we do."

Fiona Moodie on the Jesuit Property Development 12/5/16

PG2035 was to have NO land specific amendments, yet the resolution was passed by the County Council without public notice, nor proper time for review of the public’s concerns [...] 100s of people across Prince George’s County [and Bowie] feel that they have not had a say in this process.
— Fiona Moodie

I would like to start by thanking the Prince George’s County State Delegate Delegation’s time and attention to this matter.

My name is Fiona Moodie and I represent a group of nearly eight hundred Prince George’s County residents who oppose the development of the Jesuit-owned property at White Marsh. Our movement is strong and we are growing quickly across the county.

On August 1st of this year, Elm Street Developers first pitched the idea of the development to the City of Bowie. During this initial meeting we learned that Elm Street Developers HAD been coordinating with the property ownersfor several years regarding the development of this property, yet the public was only made aware just a few weeks ago, of the zoning change and potential construction of 500 homes.

As a result, many Prince George's County residents feel alienated, as they have been left out of the decision making process regarding one of the last remaining historic and rural areas in our county.

PG2035 Was to have NO land specific amendments, yet the resolution was passed by the county council, without public notice, nor proper time for review of the public's concerns and prior to the enactment of PG2035. The property owners did not wait for a master plan process with full public input.

Additionally, This property is of great historic significance, and this must not be ignored.

White Marsh was the site of an active slave plantation for several generations. 272 of these slaves were sold by the Jesuit Priests and shipped to plantations in the Deep South where their lives were much harsher than here in Maryland. The sale of these slaves kept Georgetown University afloat.

 Many slaves lived, worked and died on the White Marsh Plantation. Their graves are scattered all over this property. These men, women, and children should be left to rest in peace and not have their earthly remains turned over by a bulldozer.

A group representing the several thousand descendants of these slaves, reached out to me regarding their concern for this property. The land is crucial for the preservation and understanding of their history, the Catholic Church in America and the history of America itself. They are motivated to give testimony against the rezoning and development and would like their voices to be heard throughout this process.

Waiting to do a review of this property AFTER the site plan has been put forward is neither helpful nor appropriate.

I come here to respectfully request that the Prince George’s County Delegation sponsor and support this legislation. 100s of people across Prince George’s County feel that they have not had a say in this process. With your help and support we can ensure the integrity of the planning process, and renew the people’s confidence that their voices are being heard.

Fiona Moodie on the Melford Project

Though some surrounding streets may be within the “technical” traffic limits - we have to think about the reality of the situation and what this increase in traffic will inflict on Bowie residents. Traffic in this area is becoming unbearable. What we are looking at is implementing “traffic calming measures”: AKA speed bumps on Belair Drive.

We are punishing current Bowie residents in order to alleviate developers’ problems.
— Fiona Moodie

Tameeka Washington - Marketplace Apartment Excerpts

June 2016: "The residents who signed the petition said they felt like their city representatives did not care about their concerns.”

August 2016: “[The developer's] only concern is his bottom line and not the impact this will have on our beloved neighborhood.

September 2016: "We ask that you tell this developer the same thing council member Gardner told the developers for the Jesuit property; which is Bowie is open for business, but we are not for sale.

October 2016: “…this mad grab for developer cash from our county council and our city council is ruining our neighborhoods and running good families out of Bowie.”

November 2016: The apartment building is in the middle of a neighborhood, which will then essentially become overflow parking. I don’t know what will happen when we have snowstorms and no one is allowed to park on the street

January 2016: “We will vote you out if we feel that you our representatives are refusing to accurately reflect our wishes. It might then be too late for the Marketplace apartments, but not too late for the other development schemes you have coming down the pike like the Jesuit property.

Somerset Neighbor Alert - Larry Swank

 

A large 4-5 story, 300 unit apartment building is being planned to fill the small open space in the back of the Market Place shopping center. This will increase residential units in the S-Section by over 30% with no planned infrastructure upgrades to roads, schools, etc. This project will impact more than the skyline of your neighborhood, it will change forever the makeup of our original section of Levitt Bowie.  

Please join us this Monday and/or Tuesday evening at the Bowie City Hall, 15901 Excalibur Road, Bowie, MD. The developer will be presenting an initial site plan for their recommended use of the property.

Monday (3/7) at 8 PM – Monthly City Council Meeting, in Council Chambers room

The Market Place developer, Berman Enterprises, is on the agenda as the 1st item of New Business. They will be presenting their site plan to the City Council for the first time.  There is limited opportunity for you to comment on the apartment development at this meeting. You can talk for 3 minutes during the Citizen Participation part of the agenda, which will take place before the developer presents their plans during the later New Business section of the meeting.         

Call the City Clerk's Office at 301-809-3029 to sign up if you wish to speak at a Council meeting. The meetings are broadcast live on the city government channel (Comcast Channel 71 and Verizon Channel 10). The meetings are rebroadcast on Wednesday and Saturday evenings at 7 p.m. and may be viewed from the City of Bowie website.

 Tuesday (3/8) at 7 PM – Informal Stakeholder Meeting, in Council Chambers room

The Market Place developer, Berman Enterprises, will present the site plan to any interested residents that wish to participate. This is an informal meeting requested by the developer to present the site plan and get citizen input on the initial developer plans. You will be able to fully express concerns and ask questions. Members of the Bowie Department of Planning and Economic Development will run the meeting. You will be able to sign up for future “Stakeholder” notices at the meeting or by contacting the Planning and Economic Development staff at 301-262-6200.

If you can only attend one meeting please join us at 7 PM this Tuesday. 

Recall Now - Larry Swank

Recall Now

Please help us put the brakes on our fast changing community Many members of the Bowie City Council have been more interested in growth and tax revenue than maintaining and improving the quality of life in our unique Bowie communities. Now that council members serve for 4-years instead of 2-years they are operating in a way to support growth at any cost, putting local businesses and developer ambitions before resident’s needs.

One example of this is the resent Council decision to allow the construction of 225 apartments on the small open space behind the new Marketplace Shopping Center. On 3 January 24, 2017 the City Council voted against the findings of the Bowie Planning Department, the recommendations of the Bowie Advisory Planning Board, and over 900 resident objections. That decision shocked the bowie citizens in attendance.

Bowie citizens are empowered to recall members of the City Council, including the Mayor, who are not representing the best interest of Bowie. This action is not to punish the Council members who voted for the oversized Marketplace Apartment development. We are asking for your support to stop some members of the Council from doing the same at the Hilltop Plaza Shopping Center, Freestate (Giant) Shopping Center, Whitehall … see development plan to add more

The Marketplace Apartment development is a good example of how not to do growth in Bowie. The Council pushed the developer to clean up the mess at the Marketplace site. The City gave them land, zoning deviations, and a stack of money to build on the site. The City did not communicate with the impacted neighbors for the first three years of the project. They worked with the County to avoid formal zoning changes and fast tracked an alternative to add Apartments to the site, without citizen input. Over the last few years citizens have had little backing from most Council members to stop or rightsize the Marketplace apartment project.

We only have one or two chances in a century to impact real change on a site like the Marketplace. To date we have lost out on the appealing Bowie Main Street vision of an upscale destination with “unique character and sense of place.”

The 2006 Bowie and Vicinity Master Plan envisions a mixed-use activity center which includes the Marketplace. The plan paints an attractive picture with active commercial and residential components. It also sets forth a policy that “…development of Bowie Main Street not adversely impact the character of the existing residential neighborhood.” A key strategy of the plan is to “…transition in building density and intensity from more intense uses located at the core of Bowie Main Street along MD 450 to less intense uses along the edge, adjacent to residential neighborhoods. Well they had 10 years to get it right, they got it wrong, and the developer plans to make it worse.

The Bowie Planning Department recommend disapproval of the plan for the proposed residential component of the Marketplace and came up with correct decisions involving:

1) excessive density for both the available space on-site and the proximity to the adjacent residential neighborhood (recommending only 100 units);

2) excessive vehicle traffic on city streets that do not meet current City and County maximum service volume; and,

3) excessive scale, mass and bulk of the proposed building being incompatible with both the existing detached residential homes and the new Market Place retail buildings, which will adversely impact the character of existing neighborhoods

Some City Council members felt an obligation to the developer that went so deep that they rejected;

 922 citizen signatures on a petition to stop the additional traffic gridlock from a large apartment complex;

 professional City staff recommendations for less density, lower traffic, and compatibility with the character of existing neighborhoods

 The unanimous project disapproval of the good Bowie citizens who make up the Bowie Advisory Planning Board.

We ask your help in removing selected Bowie City Council members under the provisions of Bowie City Charter, Sec. 32A.

Recall: 1. Mayor Frederick G. Robinson

2. At-Large Councilmember James Marcos

3. District 2 Councilmember Diane Polangin

4. District 3 Councilmember Courtney Glass

City Council Meeting - March 7, 2016 - Larry Swank

Citizens were concerned about the traffic generated by the successful new Market Place businesses combined with a large apartment complex - 30 years ago Superior Lane was found inadequate for just planned business upgrades at the Market Place    
— Larry Swank

City Council Meeting - March 7, 2016

1. Larry Swank, resident of Scarlet Lane — spoke in opposition to the new apartment complex in Marketplace.

2. Mary Beth Blocker, 12419 Sussex Lane — also spoke in opposition to the residential development at Marketplace

Swank - Tonight the Market Place developer, Berman Enterprises, is on your agenda as the 1st item of New Business to discuss plans for a new apartment complex to fill the open space in the back of the Market Place shopping center. I have talked with many impacted neighbors who are concerned about preserving the neighborhood character our original section of Levitt Bowie. I want to share few of those concerns with the Council before you receive the Berman Enterprises presentation.

I am looking forward to the presentation tonight and wish to thank Berman Enterprises for this overview and the more informal “Stakeholder Meeting” set up for 7 PM tomorrow evening, March 8th, with the Bowie Department of Planning and Economic Development.  I know there will be City public hearings at a later date, but I don’t want the Council to see an initial site plan presentation without getting a flavor of some citizen concerns.

Understand that citizen comments/concerns came from limited knowledge of actual plans and are based on information from the Bowie Blade News other non-developer sources. They are built around an assumption that the developer is planning a large 4-5 story, 300 unit apartment building to fill the open space in the back of the Market Place shopping center.

Citizen Comments/Concerns

(1) Citizens expressed astonishment at the size and density of the proposed apartment complex

(2) The homes near the Market Place average less than 3 dwellings per acre, whereas the planned apartment complex would approach 60 dwellings per acre

(3) The proposed dwellings at the Market Place are comparable to the number of dwellings in Foxhill, or Heather Hills, or Overbrook, or Princeton Square, or Saddlebrook West, or Belair Town

(4) The apartment complex would increase residential units in the S-Section by over one third with no planned infrastructure upgrades to roads, schools, etc.

 (5) Overflow parking would impact access to Acorn Hill Park and residential street parking

(6) Citizens were concerned about the traffic generated by the successful new Market Place businesses combined with a large apartment complex - 30 years ago Superior Lane was found inadequate for just planned the business upgrades at the Market Place    

(7) This project will impact more than the skyline of your neighborhood, it will change forever the makeup of our original section of Levitt Bowie

(8) Citizens expected 2 story townhouses or condominiums – in keeping with the prevailing character the neighborhood. They expected a smooth height transition from Market Place business to our existing single family homes. Even the unique 3 level architecture of lower appearing buildings such as the Willows Senior Community on Enfield Chase Court would match citizen expectations.

NEW BUSINESS:

A. Bowie Marketplace Residential Development — Mr. Brian Berman with Berman Enterprises briefed Council on the status of the commercial development as well as planned concepts for the residential development at Marketplace. The commercial part is scheduled for a grand opening in September of 2016 with Harris Teeter as the anchor store as well as several other restaurants and stores like Petco, Sweet Frogs, and Firehouse Subs.

On the residential side; the design consists of 5 story apartment buildings with a total of 300 high quality units; 20% of those units will be dedicated for seniors and two parking garages. A stakeholders meeting will be held on March 8th, at 7 p. m. in City Hall that will be open to all residents for comments.

Councilmember Polangin asked if all units will be rental or will some be dedicated for ownership. Mr. Berman responded that they will all be rental with no subsidized housing, it will all be market rate.

Councilmember Esteve asked if there is any possibility of the buildings being lower than five stories. Mr. Berman responded that the design and architecture will disguise some of the height.

Councilmember Gardner asked for the status of the Shell station on the corner. Mr. Berman stated that the owners are uninterested in working with them. Councilmember Gardner also asked if the senior portion would be integrated with the other units or be separated. Mr. Berman responded it will be integrated.

Councilmember Trouth asked if there would be any social services for the senior residents. Mr. Berman replied that the units will have amenities for everyone as well as social events.

Councilmember Glass asked if the buildings would be gated or will there be 24-hour security on site. Mr. Berman responded that they have not yet finalized but the buildings will definitely not be gated.

Mayor Robinson thanked Mr. Berman for his presentation